write a research report example

Research Report

Report generator.

The act of researching can be long-winded and difficult. Once you’ve gone through it, you’ll need something to help you record your findings. For many, the thought of coming up with a research report can be as daunting as the actual research itself. This can be a kind of business report if your research has a lot to do with business or it can be academic in nature. Either way, by scrolling down you will not only learn more about this kind of document but you’ll have a list of amazing templates to choose from as well.

Brand Research Report Template

• Google Docs
• Apple Pages

Size: A4, US

Academic Research Report Template

Investment Research Report Template

Equity Research Report Template

Corporate Research Report Template

Product Research Report Template

Research Progress Report Template

Market Research Report Template

Research Report Executive Summary Template

Size: 120 KB

Research Report Gantt Chart Template

Size: 31 KB

Company Research Report Template

Size: 64 KB

Business Research Report Template

Size: 39 KB

Monthly Research Report Template

Size: 59 KB

Survey Research Report Template

Size: 58 KB

Quantitative Research Report Template

Size: 144 KB

Research Paper Report Template

Size: 191 KB

Acknowledgement For Research Project Report

Size: 162 KB

Business Project Report Word Template

Printable Survey Report Template

Training Report Template to Edit

Formal Report Template MS Word

Research Report Cover Page Template

Free Download

Sample Equity Research

Size: 887 KB

Market Research Report

Size: 78 KB

Research Report Outline

Size: 41 KB

Action Research Report

Size: 52 KB

Company Research Report Example

Size: 506 KB

Psychology Research

Size: 84 KB

Final Research Report

Size: 359 KB

Sample of Research Report

Size: 87 KB

Statistics Report

Size: 32 KB

What Is a Research Report?

By definition, a research report is a document presented when reporting about the findings or results of a research or investigation about particular subjects or topics. In business, a research report is a document containing the results of business research. A fine example of this would be the  market reports  that firms write up on a monthly or periodic basis. As you may have already expected, in lieu of actually creating a report on your own, there’s always the option of downloading items like self-report research templates and market research report samples.

Tips for Writing Your Own Research Report

If you’re having trouble coming up your research report, know that you’ve come to the right place. Learning how to write a research report does not need to be overly difficult. All one needs to do is keep a few points in mind. Having said that, take a look at the following:

Tip 1: Decide on the Report Type

By now you’re aware that there are multiple kinds of research reports. Each one will correspond to a different topic, a different industry, and various other factors. Before you get started, you need to know which one you are going to be diving into. Otherwise, the effort of creating a quality report will be wasted on you.

Tip 2: Identify Your Goals

Knowing what your goals are when it comes to your research report can help immensely with how you will end up completing it. If you recognize that your goal is to do more market research , for example, then you’ll have a much easier time coming up with a market research report.

Tip 3: Keep Everything Organized

Although there is no need to strictly adhere to any kind of research report format, you must still do what you can to ensure that your report remains organized. Take a look at any research report example or research report template . See how those examples keep themselves organized and try to copy it as much as you can.

Tip 4: Do Not Neglect to Proofread

You need to check for possible mistakes or errors in spelling, grammar , and information. Though it can also be helpful if you had somebody else to proofread your work for you. This is because a different perspective can often find things that we may be blind to.

What are the different types of research reports?

First of all, there is a technical report , which happens to be more suited to the researchers’ target audience. Then you have the popular report, which is designed to be consumed by a more general or mainstream audience. It is meant to display findings in such a non-technical manner for easier readability.

What are the different components of a research report outline?

When it comes to the research report outline, you can expect the following components: first is the abstract, followed closely by the introduction. After that, you have the research methodology , the results, and then the discussion. The references come at the very end.

How can you end or conclude a research report?

There are a few ways you can choose to end any research report you may be writing. You can choose to go for a summary , for one. Either that or you may come up with an afterword or a true conclusion.

Like any other kind of report, there are a lot of factors to consider when dealing with research reports. Having read this article, we guarantee that you are now better off compared to before due to the new-found knowledge you’ve gained here. Now all you have to do is decide how to best apply that knowledge. Will you start creating report documents yourself or are you going to choose from our list of report examples ? Either way, you can’t go wrong with the resources at your disposal, so act now!

Text prompt

• Instructive
• Professional

Generate a report on the impact of technology in the classroom on student learning outcomes

Prepare a report analyzing the trends in student participation in sports and arts programs over the last five years at your school.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 11: Presenting Your Research

Writing a Research Report in American Psychological Association (APA) Style

Learning Objectives

• Identify the major sections of an APA-style research report and the basic contents of each section.
• Plan and write an effective APA-style research report.

In this section, we look at how to write an APA-style empirical research report , an article that presents the results of one or more new studies. Recall that the standard sections of an empirical research report provide a kind of outline. Here we consider each of these sections in detail, including what information it contains, how that information is formatted and organized, and tips for writing each section. At the end of this section is a sample APA-style research report that illustrates many of these principles.

Sections of a Research Report

Title page and abstract.

An APA-style research report begins with a  title page . The title is centred in the upper half of the page, with each important word capitalized. The title should clearly and concisely (in about 12 words or fewer) communicate the primary variables and research questions. This sometimes requires a main title followed by a subtitle that elaborates on the main title, in which case the main title and subtitle are separated by a colon. Here are some titles from recent issues of professional journals published by the American Psychological Association.

• Sex Differences in Coping Styles and Implications for Depressed Mood
• Effects of Aging and Divided Attention on Memory for Items and Their Contexts
• Computer-Assisted Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Child Anxiety: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
• Virtual Driving and Risk Taking: Do Racing Games Increase Risk-Taking Cognitions, Affect, and Behaviour?

Below the title are the authors’ names and, on the next line, their institutional affiliation—the university or other institution where the authors worked when they conducted the research. As we have already seen, the authors are listed in an order that reflects their contribution to the research. When multiple authors have made equal contributions to the research, they often list their names alphabetically or in a randomly determined order.

In some areas of psychology, the titles of many empirical research reports are informal in a way that is perhaps best described as “cute.” They usually take the form of a play on words or a well-known expression that relates to the topic under study. Here are some examples from recent issues of the Journal Psychological Science .

• “Smells Like Clean Spirit: Nonconscious Effects of Scent on Cognition and Behavior”
• “Time Crawls: The Temporal Resolution of Infants’ Visual Attention”
• “Scent of a Woman: Men’s Testosterone Responses to Olfactory Ovulation Cues”
• “Apocalypse Soon?: Dire Messages Reduce Belief in Global Warming by Contradicting Just-World Beliefs”
• “Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look Like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but They Can (and Should) Be Distinguished”
• “How Do I Love Thee? Let Me Count the Words: The Social Effects of Expressive Writing”

Individual researchers differ quite a bit in their preference for such titles. Some use them regularly, while others never use them. What might be some of the pros and cons of using cute article titles?

For articles that are being submitted for publication, the title page also includes an author note that lists the authors’ full institutional affiliations, any acknowledgments the authors wish to make to agencies that funded the research or to colleagues who commented on it, and contact information for the authors. For student papers that are not being submitted for publication—including theses—author notes are generally not necessary.

The  abstract  is a summary of the study. It is the second page of the manuscript and is headed with the word  Abstract . The first line is not indented. The abstract presents the research question, a summary of the method, the basic results, and the most important conclusions. Because the abstract is usually limited to about 200 words, it can be a challenge to write a good one.

Introduction

The  introduction  begins on the third page of the manuscript. The heading at the top of this page is the full title of the manuscript, with each important word capitalized as on the title page. The introduction includes three distinct subsections, although these are typically not identified by separate headings. The opening introduces the research question and explains why it is interesting, the literature review discusses relevant previous research, and the closing restates the research question and comments on the method used to answer it.

The Opening

The  opening , which is usually a paragraph or two in length, introduces the research question and explains why it is interesting. To capture the reader’s attention, researcher Daryl Bem recommends starting with general observations about the topic under study, expressed in ordinary language (not technical jargon)—observations that are about people and their behaviour (not about researchers or their research; Bem, 2003 [1] ). Concrete examples are often very useful here. According to Bem, this would be a poor way to begin a research report:

Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance received a great deal of attention during the latter part of the 20th century (p. 191)

The following would be much better:

The individual who holds two beliefs that are inconsistent with one another may feel uncomfortable. For example, the person who knows that he or she enjoys smoking but believes it to be unhealthy may experience discomfort arising from the inconsistency or disharmony between these two thoughts or cognitions. This feeling of discomfort was called cognitive dissonance by social psychologist Leon Festinger (1957), who suggested that individuals will be motivated to remove this dissonance in whatever way they can (p. 191).

After capturing the reader’s attention, the opening should go on to introduce the research question and explain why it is interesting. Will the answer fill a gap in the literature? Will it provide a test of an important theory? Does it have practical implications? Giving readers a clear sense of what the research is about and why they should care about it will motivate them to continue reading the literature review—and will help them make sense of it.

Breaking the Rules

Researcher Larry Jacoby reported several studies showing that a word that people see or hear repeatedly can seem more familiar even when they do not recall the repetitions—and that this tendency is especially pronounced among older adults. He opened his article with the following humourous anecdote:

A friend whose mother is suffering symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) tells the story of taking her mother to visit a nursing home, preliminary to her mother’s moving there. During an orientation meeting at the nursing home, the rules and regulations were explained, one of which regarded the dining room. The dining room was described as similar to a fine restaurant except that tipping was not required. The absence of tipping was a central theme in the orientation lecture, mentioned frequently to emphasize the quality of care along with the advantages of having paid in advance. At the end of the meeting, the friend’s mother was asked whether she had any questions. She replied that she only had one question: “Should I tip?” (Jacoby, 1999, p. 3)

Although both humour and personal anecdotes are generally discouraged in APA-style writing, this example is a highly effective way to start because it both engages the reader and provides an excellent real-world example of the topic under study.

The Literature Review

Immediately after the opening comes the  literature review , which describes relevant previous research on the topic and can be anywhere from several paragraphs to several pages in length. However, the literature review is not simply a list of past studies. Instead, it constitutes a kind of argument for why the research question is worth addressing. By the end of the literature review, readers should be convinced that the research question makes sense and that the present study is a logical next step in the ongoing research process.

Like any effective argument, the literature review must have some kind of structure. For example, it might begin by describing a phenomenon in a general way along with several studies that demonstrate it, then describing two or more competing theories of the phenomenon, and finally presenting a hypothesis to test one or more of the theories. Or it might describe one phenomenon, then describe another phenomenon that seems inconsistent with the first one, then propose a theory that resolves the inconsistency, and finally present a hypothesis to test that theory. In applied research, it might describe a phenomenon or theory, then describe how that phenomenon or theory applies to some important real-world situation, and finally suggest a way to test whether it does, in fact, apply to that situation.

Looking at the literature review in this way emphasizes a few things. First, it is extremely important to start with an outline of the main points that you want to make, organized in the order that you want to make them. The basic structure of your argument, then, should be apparent from the outline itself. Second, it is important to emphasize the structure of your argument in your writing. One way to do this is to begin the literature review by summarizing your argument even before you begin to make it. “In this article, I will describe two apparently contradictory phenomena, present a new theory that has the potential to resolve the apparent contradiction, and finally present a novel hypothesis to test the theory.” Another way is to open each paragraph with a sentence that summarizes the main point of the paragraph and links it to the preceding points. These opening sentences provide the “transitions” that many beginning researchers have difficulty with. Instead of beginning a paragraph by launching into a description of a previous study, such as “Williams (2004) found that…,” it is better to start by indicating something about why you are describing this particular study. Here are some simple examples:

Another example of this phenomenon comes from the work of Williams (2004).

Williams (2004) offers one explanation of this phenomenon.

An alternative perspective has been provided by Williams (2004).

We used a method based on the one used by Williams (2004).

Finally, remember that your goal is to construct an argument for why your research question is interesting and worth addressing—not necessarily why your favourite answer to it is correct. In other words, your literature review must be balanced. If you want to emphasize the generality of a phenomenon, then of course you should discuss various studies that have demonstrated it. However, if there are other studies that have failed to demonstrate it, you should discuss them too. Or if you are proposing a new theory, then of course you should discuss findings that are consistent with that theory. However, if there are other findings that are inconsistent with it, again, you should discuss them too. It is acceptable to argue that the  balance  of the research supports the existence of a phenomenon or is consistent with a theory (and that is usually the best that researchers in psychology can hope for), but it is not acceptable to  ignore contradictory evidence. Besides, a large part of what makes a research question interesting is uncertainty about its answer.

The Closing

The  closing  of the introduction—typically the final paragraph or two—usually includes two important elements. The first is a clear statement of the main research question or hypothesis. This statement tends to be more formal and precise than in the opening and is often expressed in terms of operational definitions of the key variables. The second is a brief overview of the method and some comment on its appropriateness. Here, for example, is how Darley and Latané (1968) [2] concluded the introduction to their classic article on the bystander effect:

These considerations lead to the hypothesis that the more bystanders to an emergency, the less likely, or the more slowly, any one bystander will intervene to provide aid. To test this proposition it would be necessary to create a situation in which a realistic “emergency” could plausibly occur. Each subject should also be blocked from communicating with others to prevent his getting information about their behaviour during the emergency. Finally, the experimental situation should allow for the assessment of the speed and frequency of the subjects’ reaction to the emergency. The experiment reported below attempted to fulfill these conditions. (p. 378)

Thus the introduction leads smoothly into the next major section of the article—the method section.

The  method section  is where you describe how you conducted your study. An important principle for writing a method section is that it should be clear and detailed enough that other researchers could replicate the study by following your “recipe.” This means that it must describe all the important elements of the study—basic demographic characteristics of the participants, how they were recruited, whether they were randomly assigned, how the variables were manipulated or measured, how counterbalancing was accomplished, and so on. At the same time, it should avoid irrelevant details such as the fact that the study was conducted in Classroom 37B of the Industrial Technology Building or that the questionnaire was double-sided and completed using pencils.

The method section begins immediately after the introduction ends with the heading “Method” (not “Methods”) centred on the page. Immediately after this is the subheading “Participants,” left justified and in italics. The participants subsection indicates how many participants there were, the number of women and men, some indication of their age, other demographics that may be relevant to the study, and how they were recruited, including any incentives given for participation.

After the participants section, the structure can vary a bit. Figure 11.1 shows three common approaches. In the first, the participants section is followed by a design and procedure subsection, which describes the rest of the method. This works well for methods that are relatively simple and can be described adequately in a few paragraphs. In the second approach, the participants section is followed by separate design and procedure subsections. This works well when both the design and the procedure are relatively complicated and each requires multiple paragraphs.

What is the difference between design and procedure? The design of a study is its overall structure. What were the independent and dependent variables? Was the independent variable manipulated, and if so, was it manipulated between or within subjects? How were the variables operationally defined? The procedure is how the study was carried out. It often works well to describe the procedure in terms of what the participants did rather than what the researchers did. For example, the participants gave their informed consent, read a set of instructions, completed a block of four practice trials, completed a block of 20 test trials, completed two questionnaires, and were debriefed and excused.

In the third basic way to organize a method section, the participants subsection is followed by a materials subsection before the design and procedure subsections. This works well when there are complicated materials to describe. This might mean multiple questionnaires, written vignettes that participants read and respond to, perceptual stimuli, and so on. The heading of this subsection can be modified to reflect its content. Instead of “Materials,” it can be “Questionnaires,” “Stimuli,” and so on.

The  results section  is where you present the main results of the study, including the results of the statistical analyses. Although it does not include the raw data—individual participants’ responses or scores—researchers should save their raw data and make them available to other researchers who request them. Several journals now encourage the open sharing of raw data online.

Although there are no standard subsections, it is still important for the results section to be logically organized. Typically it begins with certain preliminary issues. One is whether any participants or responses were excluded from the analyses and why. The rationale for excluding data should be described clearly so that other researchers can decide whether it is appropriate. A second preliminary issue is how multiple responses were combined to produce the primary variables in the analyses. For example, if participants rated the attractiveness of 20 stimulus people, you might have to explain that you began by computing the mean attractiveness rating for each participant. Or if they recalled as many items as they could from study list of 20 words, did you count the number correctly recalled, compute the percentage correctly recalled, or perhaps compute the number correct minus the number incorrect? A third preliminary issue is the reliability of the measures. This is where you would present test-retest correlations, Cronbach’s α, or other statistics to show that the measures are consistent across time and across items. A final preliminary issue is whether the manipulation was successful. This is where you would report the results of any manipulation checks.

The results section should then tackle the primary research questions, one at a time. Again, there should be a clear organization. One approach would be to answer the most general questions and then proceed to answer more specific ones. Another would be to answer the main question first and then to answer secondary ones. Regardless, Bem (2003) [3] suggests the following basic structure for discussing each new result:

• Remind the reader of the research question.
• Give the answer to the research question in words.
• Present the relevant statistics.
• Qualify the answer if necessary.
• Summarize the result.

Notice that only Step 3 necessarily involves numbers. The rest of the steps involve presenting the research question and the answer to it in words. In fact, the basic results should be clear even to a reader who skips over the numbers.

The  discussion  is the last major section of the research report. Discussions usually consist of some combination of the following elements:

• Summary of the research
• Theoretical implications
• Practical implications
• Limitations
• Suggestions for future research

The discussion typically begins with a summary of the study that provides a clear answer to the research question. In a short report with a single study, this might require no more than a sentence. In a longer report with multiple studies, it might require a paragraph or even two. The summary is often followed by a discussion of the theoretical implications of the research. Do the results provide support for any existing theories? If not, how  can  they be explained? Although you do not have to provide a definitive explanation or detailed theory for your results, you at least need to outline one or more possible explanations. In applied research—and often in basic research—there is also some discussion of the practical implications of the research. How can the results be used, and by whom, to accomplish some real-world goal?

The theoretical and practical implications are often followed by a discussion of the study’s limitations. Perhaps there are problems with its internal or external validity. Perhaps the manipulation was not very effective or the measures not very reliable. Perhaps there is some evidence that participants did not fully understand their task or that they were suspicious of the intent of the researchers. Now is the time to discuss these issues and how they might have affected the results. But do not overdo it. All studies have limitations, and most readers will understand that a different sample or different measures might have produced different results. Unless there is good reason to think they  would have, however, there is no reason to mention these routine issues. Instead, pick two or three limitations that seem like they could have influenced the results, explain how they could have influenced the results, and suggest ways to deal with them.

Most discussions end with some suggestions for future research. If the study did not satisfactorily answer the original research question, what will it take to do so? What  new  research questions has the study raised? This part of the discussion, however, is not just a list of new questions. It is a discussion of two or three of the most important unresolved issues. This means identifying and clarifying each question, suggesting some alternative answers, and even suggesting ways they could be studied.

Finally, some researchers are quite good at ending their articles with a sweeping or thought-provoking conclusion. Darley and Latané (1968) [4] , for example, ended their article on the bystander effect by discussing the idea that whether people help others may depend more on the situation than on their personalities. Their final sentence is, “If people understand the situational forces that can make them hesitate to intervene, they may better overcome them” (p. 383). However, this kind of ending can be difficult to pull off. It can sound overreaching or just banal and end up detracting from the overall impact of the article. It is often better simply to end when you have made your final point (although you should avoid ending on a limitation).

The references section begins on a new page with the heading “References” centred at the top of the page. All references cited in the text are then listed in the format presented earlier. They are listed alphabetically by the last name of the first author. If two sources have the same first author, they are listed alphabetically by the last name of the second author. If all the authors are the same, then they are listed chronologically by the year of publication. Everything in the reference list is double-spaced both within and between references.

Appendices, Tables, and Figures

Appendices, tables, and figures come after the references. An  appendix  is appropriate for supplemental material that would interrupt the flow of the research report if it were presented within any of the major sections. An appendix could be used to present lists of stimulus words, questionnaire items, detailed descriptions of special equipment or unusual statistical analyses, or references to the studies that are included in a meta-analysis. Each appendix begins on a new page. If there is only one, the heading is “Appendix,” centred at the top of the page. If there is more than one, the headings are “Appendix A,” “Appendix B,” and so on, and they appear in the order they were first mentioned in the text of the report.

After any appendices come tables and then figures. Tables and figures are both used to present results. Figures can also be used to illustrate theories (e.g., in the form of a flowchart), display stimuli, outline procedures, and present many other kinds of information. Each table and figure appears on its own page. Tables are numbered in the order that they are first mentioned in the text (“Table 1,” “Table 2,” and so on). Figures are numbered the same way (“Figure 1,” “Figure 2,” and so on). A brief explanatory title, with the important words capitalized, appears above each table. Each figure is given a brief explanatory caption, where (aside from proper nouns or names) only the first word of each sentence is capitalized. More details on preparing APA-style tables and figures are presented later in the book.

Sample APA-Style Research Report

Figures 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, and 11.5 show some sample pages from an APA-style empirical research report originally written by undergraduate student Tomoe Suyama at California State University, Fresno. The main purpose of these figures is to illustrate the basic organization and formatting of an APA-style empirical research report, although many high-level and low-level style conventions can be seen here too.

Key Takeaways

• An APA-style empirical research report consists of several standard sections. The main ones are the abstract, introduction, method, results, discussion, and references.
• The introduction consists of an opening that presents the research question, a literature review that describes previous research on the topic, and a closing that restates the research question and comments on the method. The literature review constitutes an argument for why the current study is worth doing.
• The method section describes the method in enough detail that another researcher could replicate the study. At a minimum, it consists of a participants subsection and a design and procedure subsection.
• The results section describes the results in an organized fashion. Each primary result is presented in terms of statistical results but also explained in words.
• The discussion typically summarizes the study, discusses theoretical and practical implications and limitations of the study, and offers suggestions for further research.
• Practice: Look through an issue of a general interest professional journal (e.g.,  Psychological Science ). Read the opening of the first five articles and rate the effectiveness of each one from 1 ( very ineffective ) to 5 ( very effective ). Write a sentence or two explaining each rating.
• Practice: Find a recent article in a professional journal and identify where the opening, literature review, and closing of the introduction begin and end.
• Practice: Find a recent article in a professional journal and highlight in a different colour each of the following elements in the discussion: summary, theoretical implications, practical implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research.

Long Descriptions

Figure 11.1 long description: Table showing three ways of organizing an APA-style method section.

In the simple method, there are two subheadings: “Participants” (which might begin “The participants were…”) and “Design and procedure” (which might begin “There were three conditions…”).

In the typical method, there are three subheadings: “Participants” (“The participants were…”), “Design” (“There were three conditions…”), and “Procedure” (“Participants viewed each stimulus on the computer screen…”).

In the complex method, there are four subheadings: “Participants” (“The participants were…”), “Materials” (“The stimuli were…”), “Design” (“There were three conditions…”), and “Procedure” (“Participants viewed each stimulus on the computer screen…”). [Return to Figure 11.1]

• Bem, D. J. (2003). Writing the empirical journal article. In J. M. Darley, M. P. Zanna, & H. R. Roediger III (Eds.),  The compleat academic: A practical guide for the beginning social scientist  (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. ↵
• Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 , 377–383. ↵

A type of research article which describes one or more new empirical studies conducted by the authors.

The page at the beginning of an APA-style research report containing the title of the article, the authors’ names, and their institutional affiliation.

A summary of a research study.

The third page of a manuscript containing the research question, the literature review, and comments about how to answer the research question.

An introduction to the research question and explanation for why this question is interesting.

A description of relevant previous research on the topic being discusses and an argument for why the research is worth addressing.

The end of the introduction, where the research question is reiterated and the method is commented upon.

The section of a research report where the method used to conduct the study is described.

The main results of the study, including the results from statistical analyses, are presented in a research article.

Section of a research report that summarizes the study's results and interprets them by referring back to the study's theoretical background.

Part of a research report which contains supplemental material.

Research Methods in Psychology - 2nd Canadian Edition Copyright © 2015 by Paul C. Price, Rajiv Jhangiani, & I-Chant A. Chiang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

• Privacy Policy

Home » Research Results Section – Writing Guide and Examples

Research Results Section – Writing Guide and Examples

Table of Contents

The results section of a research paper is a crucial part of any academic study. It provides a structured and clear presentation of the findings, enabling readers to understand the outcomes of the research. This section focuses strictly on presenting the data, leaving analysis and interpretation for the discussion section. Writing this section effectively requires precision, clarity, and adherence to the research questions or hypotheses.

Research Results

The results section is where researchers present the findings of their study. It showcases the data collected during the research process, organized systematically for clarity. This section may include both qualitative and quantitative data, often supported by visual aids like tables, charts, and graphs. Importantly, this section avoids subjective interpretations and focuses solely on the objective presentation of data.

Key Characteristics

• Objectivity : Ensures that findings are reported without bias.
• Clarity : Structures information logically to help readers easily comprehend the results.
• Relevance : Includes only data that directly addresses the research questions or hypotheses.
• Conciseness with Detail : Summarizes key findings comprehensively without overloading with excessive information.

Purpose of the Results Section

The results section serves several important functions in a research paper. Its primary goals are to:

• Report the findings of the study systematically and without interpretation.
• Address the research questions or hypotheses explicitly, showing whether they were supported or rejected.
• Provide enough detail for other researchers to replicate the study if needed.
• Lay the groundwork for the discussion section, where implications and significance are explored.

Steps to Write an Effective Results Section

Provide an overview.

Begin with a brief summary of the research goals and the methods used to analyze the data. This introductory context helps readers understand the framework within which the results are presented.

“This section presents the outcomes of the study, which investigated the relationship between physical activity and mental well-being using a quantitative research design.”

Organize Findings Clearly

Organize the results in a logical sequence that aligns with your research questions, hypotheses, or the flow of data collection. Consider structuring the section by:

• Research Question or Hypothesis : Address each systematically.
• Themes or Categories : Group similar findings together, particularly in qualitative studies.
• Chronological Order : Present data as it was collected or analyzed.

Incorporate Visual Aids

Use tables, figures, and graphs to present numerical data, trends, and relationships clearly. Visual aids should complement the text and provide readers with an at-a-glance understanding of complex information.

• Label all visuals appropriately (e.g., “Figure 1: Trends in Weekly Exercise Habits”).
• Include explanatory captions to clarify what each visual represents.
• Reference visuals within the text to ensure readers understand their relevance.

“As shown in Table 2, there was a significant increase in mental well-being scores among participants engaging in daily exercise routines.”

Report Quantitative Findings

For quantitative studies, ensure that numerical data is reported accurately and with appropriate statistical detail. Include:

• Descriptive statistics like means, medians, and standard deviations.
• Inferential statistics, including tests performed (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA) and outcomes (e.g., p-values, effect sizes).

“The analysis revealed that participants who exercised for at least 30 minutes daily reported significantly higher well-being scores (M = 85.3, SD = 7.2) than those who did not (M = 68.4, SD = 8.9), t(78) = 5.67, p < .001.”

Summarize Qualitative Findings

For qualitative data, use themes or categories to organize your results. Include illustrative quotes or excerpts from participants to support your findings. Ensure these excerpts highlight the themes you identified during analysis.

“Participants frequently mentioned the stress-reducing benefits of exercise, with one respondent stating, ‘My morning walk helps me clear my mind and focus better throughout the day.'”

Avoid Interpretation

The results section must present data without any subjective analysis. Interpretation and implications should be saved for the discussion section.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Including too much raw data.

Excessive raw data can overwhelm readers. Instead, present summarized findings, and use appendices for detailed datasets if necessary.

Mixing Results and Discussion

Avoid combining interpretation with results. This can confuse readers and detract from the objective reporting of findings.

Lack of Organization

Disorganized findings can make it challenging for readers to follow your research outcomes. Use headings, subheadings, and logical flow to enhance readability.

Neglecting Negative Results

Report all findings, including those that do not support your hypotheses. Negative or unexpected results are equally important for a comprehensive understanding of your study.

Insufficient Detail

Provide enough context and detail for readers to evaluate your findings. Vague reporting can reduce the credibility of your research.

Examples of Results Section

Quantitative study example.

The survey findings showed that 65% of respondents preferred hybrid work models (n = 520), compared to 20% favoring in-office setups and 15% preferring fully remote work. A chi-square test revealed a significant association between preference and age group, χ²(2, N = 520) = 12.89, p < .001, with younger participants showing the strongest preference for hybrid models.

Qualitative Study Example

The thematic analysis identified three major themes: flexibility, productivity, and work-life balance. Flexibility was the most frequently cited benefit, with one participant noting, “Hybrid work allows me to be productive while still having time for my family.”

Mixed-Methods Study Example

Quantitative data revealed a 25% increase in productivity scores among employees using hybrid models (M = 80.2, SD = 10.5), compared to in-office setups (M = 64.8, SD = 9.3), t(150) = 4.21, p < .001. Qualitative interviews supported these findings, with participants describing hybrid models as “efficient” and “motivating.”

Checklist for the Results Section

• Are all findings relevant to the research questions or hypotheses?
• Is the section logically organized and easy to follow?
• Are visual aids used appropriately to enhance understanding?
• Are statistical details (if applicable) reported accurately and comprehensively?
• Are qualitative findings clearly summarized with evidence?
• Is the distinction between results and discussion maintained?

The results section is a cornerstone of any research paper. By presenting findings clearly and systematically, researchers provide the evidence upon which their conclusions are based. Whether using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods, a well-written results section ensures the study’s credibility and clarity. Adhering to best practices, avoiding common errors, and employing effective organization will help you craft a results section that is both informative and impactful.

• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . Sage publications.
• APA (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook . Sage.
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide . Sage.

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Research Contribution – Thesis Guide

APA Table of Contents – Format and Example

Research Paper Outline – Types, Example, Template

Ethical Considerations – Types, Examples and...

Research Gap – Types, Examples and How to...

Dissertation vs Thesis – Key Differences