among the requirements for the classical experimental design

• High School
• You don't have any recent items yet.
• You don't have any courses yet.
• You don't have any books yet.
• You don't have any Studylists yet.
• Barstow Community College
• Introduction to Psychology

Among the requirements for the classical experimental design is a

Subject : Other

Answer created with ai.

The correct answer is:

• Dependent variable for both the experimental and control groups.

Explanation

In a classical experimental design, the aim is to determine whether a change in an independent variable causes a change in a dependent variable. To do this, we need to measure the dependent variable in both the experimental group (which receives the intervention or treatment) and the control group (which does not receive the intervention).

Here's a simple table to illustrate this:

The independent variable is what the researcher manipulates to see if it has an effect. The dependent variable is what is measured to see if it changes as a result of the manipulation of the independent variable.

In the experimental group, the independent variable is manipulated and the dependent variable is measured. In the control group, the independent variable is not manipulated, but the dependent variable is still measured. This allows the researcher to compare the results and determine if the manipulation of the independent variable had an effect.

Relevant documents

Documents that match the answer

• Discover more from: Introduction to Psychology PSYC 1 Barstow Community College 5   Documents Go to course

Related Answered Questions

• Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 1) 10 days ago What is the primary effect of bilingualism for a child? Group of answer choices It causes the child to not want to communicate. It restricts the child's social network. It expands access to concepts. It reduces a child's mathematical advancement. (more) 0 1 Answers
• Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 1) 10 days ago What is the primary effect of bilingualism for a child? (more) 0 1 Answers
• Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 1) 1 month ago Which of the following is POOR advice for a qualitative field interviewer? Group of answer choices Learn to listen, think, and talk almost at the same time. Be more interested than interesting. Do not deviate from your schedule of pre-established questions. Don’t try to halt your respondents’ line of discussion even if it’s not on topic. Enter the interview with an open mind of what the results may be. (more) 0 1 Answers
• Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 1) 1 month ago A friend of yours, a senior, took the Graduate Record Exam in September and scored in the 99th percentile. In February, your friend took the same exam over again. This time your friend scored in the 84th percentile. As a research methods student, you told your friend that his/her lowered score was most likely due Group of answer choices testing. experimental morality. statistical regression. maturation. history. (more) 0 1 Answers
• Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 1) 1 month ago Which of the following does NOT exemplify a natural experiment? Group of answer choices exploring the behavioral consequences on families when the breadwinner is killed on the job doing a comparative analysis of families that choose to stay and those who choose to move out of an ethnically changing neighborhood to find out the underlying causes for the difference in their choices determining the effects of the preferential hiring of people with disabilities on the morale of people without disabilities comparing the results of standardized test scores after the school year recruiting participants to watch a documentary and then measuring their opinions (more) 0 1 Answers
• Introduction to Psychology (PSYC 1) 1 month ago Which of the following is LEAST suited to providing clear evidence about a causal relationship between the independent and dependent variables? Group of answer choices classical experimental design Solomon four-group design posttest-only control group design one-shot case study pretest-only control group design (more) 0 1 Answers

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

30 8.1 Experimental design: What is it and when should it be used?

Learning objectives.

• Define experiment
• Identify the core features of true experimental designs
• Describe the difference between an experimental group and a control group
• Identify and describe the various types of true experimental designs

Experiments are an excellent data collection strategy for social workers wishing to observe the effects of a clinical intervention or social welfare program. Understanding what experiments are and how they are conducted is useful for all social scientists, whether they actually plan to use this methodology or simply aim to understand findings from experimental studies. An experiment is a method of data collection designed to test hypotheses under controlled conditions. In social scientific research, the term experiment has a precise meaning and should not be used to describe all research methodologies.

Experiments have a long and important history in social science. Behaviorists such as John Watson, B. F. Skinner, Ivan Pavlov, and Albert Bandura used experimental design to demonstrate the various types of conditioning. Using strictly controlled environments, behaviorists were able to isolate a single stimulus as the cause of measurable differences in behavior or physiological responses. The foundations of social learning theory and behavior modification are found in experimental research projects. Moreover, behaviorist experiments brought psychology and social science away from the abstract world of Freudian analysis and towards empirical inquiry, grounded in real-world observations and objectively-defined variables. Experiments are used at all levels of social work inquiry, including agency-based experiments that test therapeutic interventions and policy experiments that test new programs.

Several kinds of experimental designs exist. In general, designs considered to be true experiments contain three basic key features:

• random assignment of participants into experimental and control groups
• a “treatment” (or intervention) provided to the experimental group
• measurement of the effects of the treatment in a post-test administered to both groups

Some true experiments are more complex.  Their designs can also include a pre-test and can have more than two groups, but these are the minimum requirements for a design to be a true experiment.

Experimental and control groups

In a true experiment, the effect of an intervention is tested by comparing two groups: one that is exposed to the intervention (the experimental group , also known as the treatment group) and another that does not receive the intervention (the control group ). Importantly, participants in a true experiment need to be randomly assigned to either the control or experimental groups. Random assignment uses a random number generator or some other random process to assign people into experimental and control groups. Random assignment is important in experimental research because it helps to ensure that the experimental group and control group are comparable and that any differences between the experimental and control groups are due to random chance. We will address more of the logic behind random assignment in the next section.

Treatment or intervention

In an experiment, the independent variable is receiving the intervention being tested—for example, a therapeutic technique, prevention program, or access to some service or support. It is less common in of social work research, but social science research may also have a stimulus, rather than an intervention as the independent variable. For example, an electric shock or a reading about death might be used as a stimulus to provoke a response.

In some cases, it may be immoral to withhold treatment completely from a control group within an experiment. If you recruited two groups of people with severe addiction and only provided treatment to one group, the other group would likely suffer. For these cases, researchers use a control group that receives “treatment as usual.” Experimenters must clearly define what treatment as usual means. For example, a standard treatment in substance abuse recovery is attending Alcoholics Anonymous or Narcotics Anonymous meetings. A substance abuse researcher conducting an experiment may use twelve-step programs in their control group and use their experimental intervention in the experimental group. The results would show whether the experimental intervention worked better than normal treatment, which is useful information.

The dependent variable is usually the intended effect the researcher wants the intervention to have. If the researcher is testing a new therapy for individuals with binge eating disorder, their dependent variable may be the number of binge eating episodes a participant reports. The researcher likely expects her intervention to decrease the number of binge eating episodes reported by participants. Thus, she must, at a minimum, measure the number of episodes that occur after the intervention, which is the post-test .  In a classic experimental design, participants are also given a pretest to measure the dependent variable before the experimental treatment begins.

Types of experimental design

Let’s put these concepts in chronological order so we can better understand how an experiment runs from start to finish. Once you’ve collected your sample, you’ll need to randomly assign your participants to the experimental group and control group. In a common type of experimental design, you will then give both groups your pretest, which measures your dependent variable, to see what your participants are like before you start your intervention. Next, you will provide your intervention, or independent variable, to your experimental group, but not to your control group. Many interventions last a few weeks or months to complete, particularly therapeutic treatments. Finally, you will administer your post-test to both groups to observe any changes in your dependent variable. What we’ve just described is known as the classical experimental design and is the simplest type of true experimental design. All of the designs we review in this section are variations on this approach. Figure 8.1 visually represents these steps.

An interesting example of experimental research can be found in Shannon K. McCoy and Brenda Major’s (2003) study of people’s perceptions of prejudice. In one portion of this multifaceted study, all participants were given a pretest to assess their levels of depression. No significant differences in depression were found between the experimental and control groups during the pretest. Participants in the experimental group were then asked to read an article suggesting that prejudice against their own racial group is severe and pervasive, while participants in the control group were asked to read an article suggesting that prejudice against a racial group other than their own is severe and pervasive. Clearly, these were not meant to be interventions or treatments to help depression, but were stimuli designed to elicit changes in people’s depression levels. Upon measuring depression scores during the post-test period, the researchers discovered that those who had received the experimental stimulus (the article citing prejudice against their same racial group) reported greater depression than those in the control group. This is just one of many examples of social scientific experimental research.

In addition to classic experimental design, there are two other ways of designing experiments that are considered to fall within the purview of “true” experiments (Babbie, 2010; Campbell & Stanley, 1963).  The posttest-only control group design is almost the same as classic experimental design, except it does not use a pretest. Researchers who use posttest-only designs want to eliminate testing effects , in which participants’ scores on a measure change because they have already been exposed to it. If you took multiple SAT or ACT practice exams before you took the real one you sent to colleges, you’ve taken advantage of testing effects to get a better score. Considering the previous example on racism and depression, participants who are given a pretest about depression before being exposed to the stimulus would likely assume that the intervention is designed to address depression. That knowledge could cause them to answer differently on the post-test than they otherwise would. In theory, as long as the control and experimental groups have been determined randomly and are therefore comparable, no pretest is needed. However, most researchers prefer to use pretests in case randomization did not result in equivalent groups and to help assess change over time within both the experimental and control groups.

Researchers wishing to account for testing effects but also gather pretest data can use a Solomon four-group design. In the Solomon four-group design , the researcher uses four groups. Two groups are treated as they would be in a classic experiment—pretest, experimental group intervention, and post-test. The other two groups do not receive the pretest, though one receives the intervention. All groups are given the post-test. Table 8.1 illustrates the features of each of the four groups in the Solomon four-group design. By having one set of experimental and control groups that complete the pretest (Groups 1 and 2) and another set that does not complete the pretest (Groups 3 and 4), researchers using the Solomon four-group design can account for testing effects in their analysis.

Solomon four-group designs are challenging to implement in the real world because they are time- and resource-intensive. Researchers must recruit enough participants to create four groups and implement interventions in two of them.

Overall, true experimental designs are sometimes difficult to implement in a real-world practice environment. It may be impossible to withhold treatment from a control group or randomly assign participants in a study. In these cases, pre-experimental and quasi-experimental designs–which we  will discuss in the next section–can be used.  However, the differences in rigor from true experimental designs leave their conclusions more open to critique.

Experimental design in macro-level research

You can imagine that social work researchers may be limited in their ability to use random assignment when examining the effects of governmental policy on individuals.  For example, it is unlikely that a researcher could randomly assign some states to implement decriminalization of recreational marijuana and some states not to in order to assess the effects of the policy change.  There are, however, important examples of policy experiments that use random assignment, including the Oregon Medicaid experiment. In the Oregon Medicaid experiment, the wait list for Oregon was so long, state officials conducted a lottery to see who from the wait list would receive Medicaid (Baicker et al., 2013).  Researchers used the lottery as a natural experiment that included random assignment. People selected to be a part of Medicaid were the experimental group and those on the wait list were in the control group. There are some practical complications macro-level experiments, just as with other experiments.  For example, the ethical concern with using people on a wait list as a control group exists in macro-level research just as it does in micro-level research.

Key Takeaways

• True experimental designs require random assignment.
• Control groups do not receive an intervention, and experimental groups receive an intervention.
• The basic components of a true experiment include a pretest, posttest, control group, and experimental group.
• Testing effects may cause researchers to use variations on the classic experimental design.
• Classic experimental design- uses random assignment, an experimental and control group, as well as pre- and posttesting
• Control group- the group in an experiment that does not receive the intervention
• Experiment- a method of data collection designed to test hypotheses under controlled conditions
• Experimental group- the group in an experiment that receives the intervention
• Posttest- a measurement taken after the intervention
• Posttest-only control group design- a type of experimental design that uses random assignment, and an experimental and control group, but does not use a pretest
• Pretest- a measurement taken prior to the intervention
• Random assignment-using a random process to assign people into experimental and control groups
• Solomon four-group design- uses random assignment, two experimental and two control groups, pretests for half of the groups, and posttests for all
• Testing effects- when a participant’s scores on a measure change because they have already been exposed to it
• True experiments- a group of experimental designs that contain independent and dependent variables, pretesting and post testing, and experimental and control groups

Image attributions

exam scientific experiment by mohamed_hassan CC-0

Foundations of Social Work Research Copyright © 2020 by Rebecca L. Mauldin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

SOCI2000 6.0 The Experiment: Classical Experimental Design

Lecture slides, video lecture (from 2019), random assignment, the classical experimental design, exercise: identify the following elements of a classical experimental design in migram’s authority experiment.

Week 6 Lecture Slides

Classical Experimental design

Independent variable

Dependent variable

Random assignment

Experimental group

Control group

Key Concepts:

Double-blind experiment

Confederates

Types of experiments:

Classical experimental design

True experiment

Quasi-experiment

One-shot case study

Natural experiment

Field experiment

Internal validity

External validity

Operational

Random assignment = Using a mathematically random process to sort participants into two or more groups.

E.g. Flip a coin to assign to groups

Matching cases = An alternative to random assignment, where for every participant in experimental group, another participant is found for control group with almost identical characteristics

E.g. Create two groups of countries: one with minimum wage, one without. Use matching to make sure each case is matched with a case with similar GDP per capita.

The classical experimental design includes:

• Independent variable = treatment (cause)
• Dependent variable = outcome (effect)
• Pretest = A measurement of the dependent variable before introducing the independent variable
• Posttest = A measurement of the dependent variable after introducing the independent variable
• Experimental group = a group that receives the independent variable (or receives a higher level of it)
• Control group = a group that does not receive the independent variable (or receives a lower level of it)
• Random assignment = mathematically random assignment to control or experimental group.

Watch the following video, which is a recreation of the famous experiment by Stanley Milgram on obedience to authority.

Identify the following elements of a classical experimental design in Migram’s Authority experiment?

• independent variable
• dependent variable
• experimental group
• control group
• random assignment

Video of recreation of Migram’s obedience experiment

Figure 1: Various experimental eonditions and changes in dependent variable for Milgram’s authority/obedience experiment

Classical Design and Analysis of Experiments

• First Online: 16 March 2023

Cite this chapter

• Ron S. Kenett 10 ,
• Shelemyahu Zacks 11 &
• Peter Gedeck 12  

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry, Technology, and Engineering ((SITE))

951 Accesses

Experiments are used in industry to improve productivity, reduce variability, enhance quality and obtain robust products and manufacturing processes. In this chapter we study how to design and analyze experiments which are aimed at testing scientific or technological hypotheses. These hypotheses are concerned with the effects of procedures or treatments on quality and productivity; or the general relationship between variables. Designed experiments help determine the conditions under which a production process yields maximum output or other optimum results, etc. The chapter presents the classical methods of design of experiments. It starts with an introductory section with examples and discusses guiding principles in designing experiments. The chapter covers the range of classical experimental designs including complete block designs, Latin squares, full and fractional factorial designs with factors at two and three levels. The basic approach to the analysis is through modeling the response variable and computing ANOVA tables. Particular attention is given to the generation of designs using Python.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info
• Durable hardcover edition

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Box GEP, Hunter JS, Hunter WG (2005) Statistics for experimenters: design, innovation, and discovery, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken

Google Scholar  

Draper NR, Smith H (1998) Applied regression analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

Book   Google Scholar  

Goos (2011) Optimal design of experiments: a case study approach, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken

Kenett RS, Shmueli G (2016) Information quality: the potential of data and analytics to generate knowledge, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester

Kenett RS, Vogel B (1991) Going beyond main-effect plots. Qual Prog 24(2):71–73

Kenett RS, Zacks S, Gedeck P (2022b) Modern statistics: a computer-based approach with python, 1st edn. Springer, Birkhäuser

Kiefer J (1959) Optimum experimental designs. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 21(2):272–319

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Lin KM, Kacker RN (2012) Optimizing the wave soldering process. In: Dehnad K (ed) Quality control, robust design, and the Taguchi Method, 1989th edn., Wadsworth BrooksCole, Pacific Grove, pp 143–157

Nguyen NK, Pham TD (2016) Small mixed-level screening designs with orthogonal quadratic effects. J Qual Technol 48(4):405–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2016.11918176

Article   Google Scholar  

Oikawa T, Oka T (1987) New techniques for approximating the stress in pad-type nozzles attached to a spherical shell. Trans Am Soc Mechan Eng 109:188–192

Tang B, Deng LY (1999) Minimum G2-aberration for nonregular fractional factorial designs. Ann Stat 27(6):1914–1926

Wynn HP (1972) Results in the theory and construction of D-optimum experimental designs. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 34(2):133–147

Zacks S (1973) Sequential design for a fixed width interval estimation of the common mean of two normal distributions. I. The case of one variance known. J Am Stat Assoc 68(342):422–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/2284090

MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Zahran A, Anderson-Cook CM, Myers RH (2003) Fraction of design space to assess prediction capability of response surface designs. J Qual Technol 35(4):377–386

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

KPA Ltd., Ra’anana, Israel

Ron S. Kenett

Binghamton University, Mc Lean, VA, USA

Shelemyahu Zacks

University of Virginia, Falls Church, VA, USA

Peter Gedeck

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

5.1 Electronic supplementary material

Caption of the data object (pdf 391 kb), copyright information.

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Kenett, R.S., Zacks, S., Gedeck, P. (2023). Classical Design and Analysis of Experiments. In: Industrial Statistics. Statistics for Industry, Technology, and Engineering. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28482-3_5

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28482-3_5

Published : 16 March 2023

Publisher Name : Birkhäuser, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-28481-6

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-28482-3

eBook Packages : Mathematics and Statistics Mathematics and Statistics (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research