essay competition architecture

By submitting your essay, you give the Berkeley Prize the nonexclusive, perpetual right to reproduce the essay or any part of the essay, in any and all media at the Berkeley Prize’s discretion.  A “nonexclusive” right means you are not restricted from publishing your paper elsewhere if you use the following attribution that must appear in that new placement: “First submitted to and/or published by the international Berkeley Undergraduate Prize for Architectural Design Excellence ( www.BerkeleyPrize.org ) in competition year 20(--) (and if applicable) and winner of that year’s (First, Second, Third…) Essay prize.” Finally, you warrant the essay does not violate any intellectual property rights of others and indemnify the BERKELEY PRIZE against any costs, loss, or expense arising out of a violation of this warranty.

Registration and Submission

You (and your teammate if you have one) will be asked to complete a short registration form which will not be seen by members of the Berkeley Prize Committee or Jury.

REGISTER HERE.

Additional Help and Information

• Hispanoamérica
• Work at ArchDaily
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Cookie Policy
• Architecture Competitions

Call for Entries : AVANI ESSAY PRIZE 2023

• Published on December 04, 2023

Avani Essay Prize, 2023, is an essay competition for full-time registered undergraduate students of architecture, planning, and design from around the world. The Avani Essay Prize is dedicated to fostering intellectual exploration and encouraging students to express their thoughts and ideas through the written word. This year we intend to explore the concept of a "city" that challenges the conventional narratives about its nature and purpose.

Essay Brief: What is a city? To whom does it belong? When do we call a place ‘city’? Does it have a fixed definition that provides answers to these questions, or is it a living, complex being ever open to redefinition and interpretation? The conventional narrative often perceives the city as either a mechanised powerhouse, where people come to seek fortune, or as a machine creating ecological disasters with unliveable environments. But is there a city that exists between these narratives? A city that creates dynamic ecosystems offering refuge, empowerment, and resilience to both human and non-human species? The essay prize invites rumination upon an alternative narrative that falls between the extremes often associated with cities.

Download the PDF for detailed information about the theme, guidelines, and submission deadlines.

Send your entries to [email protected].

Key Details: Submission Deadline: 26 November 2023 Word Limit: 2000 - 2500 words Eligibility: Full-time registered undergraduate students of architecture, planning, and design. Prize: Rs. 10,000/- with publication in a reputed national journal

Download the information related to this competition here.

Submission Deadline

This competition was submitted by an ArchDaily user. If you'd like to submit a competition, call for submissions or other architectural 'opportunity' please use our "Submit a Competition" form. The views expressed in announcements submitted by ArchDaily users do not necessarily reflect the views of ArchDaily.

• Sustainability

世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!

想浏览archdaily中国吗, you've started following your first account, did you know.

You'll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.

INTERNATIONAL ESSAY COMPETITION

SUSTAINABILITY

Certificate + Publication & more

REGISTRATION DEADLINE

Saturday, 30 September, 2023

Competition Introduction

Introduction The essay competition aims to explore the critical role of architecture in promoting sustainability and creating a better future for our planet. As the world faces environmental challenges and the urgent need for sustainable development, architects play a crucial part in designing and constructing buildings that minimize their environmental impact and contribute to the well-being of occupants and communities. This competition invites participants to delve into the concept of sustainability in architecture, showcasing innovative ideas, best practices, and the potential of architecture to drive positive change. Essay Requirements: 1. Define Sustainability in Architecture: Explain what sustainability means in the context of architecture and its fundamental principles. Discuss the importance of sustainable design, materials, and construction techniques, highlighting their potential benefits for the environment, society, and the economy. 2. Sustainable Design Strategies: Explore various sustainable design strategies employed in architecture, such as passive design, energy efficiency, water conservation, and waste reduction. Discuss how these strategies can be integrated into architectural projects to minimize the ecological footprint and promote long-term sustainability. 3. Case Studies: Select and analyze one or more real-life architectural projects that embody sustainability principles. Describe the key features, design choices, and technologies employed in these projects, emphasizing their environmental and social impact. Assess their success and identify any challenges encountered during the implementation. 4. Urban Planning and Community Engagement: Address the role of architecture in urban planning and community engagement for sustainability. Discuss how architects can collaborate with urban planners, policymakers, and local communities to create sustainable neighborhoods, revitalized public spaces, and resilient cities. Explore the importance of social equity and inclusivity in sustainable architectural design. 5. Technological Innovations and Future Trends: Investigate emerging technologies and innovations that have the potential to revolutionize sustainable architecture. This could include advancements in materials, construction techniques, renewable energy integration, and smart building technologies. Assess the opportunities and challenges associated with adopting these innovations and discuss their potential impact on the future of architecture. 6. Conclusion: Summarize the key points discussed in the essay, emphasizing the pivotal role of architecture in shaping a sustainable future. Reflect on the potential of sustainable design and architectural practices to mitigate environmental impact, improve human well-being, and foster resilient communities. Highlight the responsibility architects hold in promoting sustainable development and encourage further research and innovation in the field. Participation: • This competition is open to all. • You can participate individually or as a team (Maximum 4 members in a team)

Detailed Competition Brief

The brief can be downloaded as often as required. It contains all the information about this competition; no additional information will be provided after registration.

BRIEF + SUBMISSIONS REQUIREMENTS

Prizes & Recognition

Recognition is the key to success for any design professional. Archiol is providing an opportunity to showcase your creativity at the global level. This opportunity is open to all.

CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT

(TEXT + VIDEO)

PUBLICATION OF AN ARTICLE

/ DESIGN ON ARCHIOL.

ARCHIOL INTERNAL JURY FAVOURITE 

PUBLICATION CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT

+3  HONOURABLE MENTIONS

+10  SHORTLISTED ENTRIES

Music files

Select and download a music piece from below:

We collaborate with leading architects, designers, and academicians of international repute to participate as jury members in our competitions. Contacting any of the jury members leads to disqualification from the competition. Communication regarding the competition should be carried out with archiol staff only. For any queries please contact us at [email protected]

Registration Deadline

Submission Deadline

Thursday, 12 October, 2023

Result Announcement

Sunday, 24 December, 2023

All deadlines are 11:59 PM  UTC  (Coordinated Universal Time)

Competition Question & Answer

TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO THE COMPETITION CLICK BELOW.

Registration Fees Details

UNIVERSITY DISCOUNTS

Contact us to receive university discounts.   Send us  a request from your university email address along with basic information about yourself and your university/school. Attach your university ID cards to the email.  

Architecture Students group

min. 5 participants from the same institution: 10% off on standard & late registration fee.

min. 15 participants from the same institution: 20% off on standard & late registration fee.

DISCOUNT FOR INDIAN PARTICIPANTS

10% off on standard & late registration fee.

Register Now!

Media partners.

• How do I create my participation code? Participation code / registration code details are in the final registration form. Final registration form link appears after paying the registration fees.
• Where do I submit my entry? Submissions to be emailed at [email protected], Please follow the submission instructions mentioned in the competition brief.
• How do I ask a query that is not mentioned here? Email us your query at [email protected]
• How do I register my team members? Team registration form- link will appear after paying the registration fees.
• How can I modify my submission? You cannot modify your submission. In extreme situations please get in touch with us at [email protected] and we will get back to you within 24 hours.
• How can I be sure that you have received my entry? You will receive a confirmation email acknowledging receipt of your entry within 24 hours. Please check your spam folder in case you don't find it.
• How can I receive judges ratings and comments? We cannot offer individual comments to its entrants due to high volume of entries.
• How can I withdraw my entry / get refund? No refunds shall be issued once the registration is completed. Please do not contact us for refunds.

Competition Organizers

competitions

LATEST COMPETITIONS!

©  2022

TERMS & CONDITIONS

PRIVACY POLICY

COOKIE POLICY

History of Architecture | Essay Competition

Submission: 11th August 2023, Registration: 31st July 2023, Language: English Prizes: Please see the details below Type: Open

Archiol Competitions has organized this second edition of the History of architecture essay competition to understand the past of architecture for better architectural future.

“History is who we are and why we are the way we are.” – David McCullough

History of Architecture is a 2023 Presentation and Writing Competition organized by Archiol Competitions. Architecture evolved over the centuries with the rise and fall of civilizations. Architecture is the essence of the history of Human Civilization. The competition – ‘History of Architecture’ – is looking for a presentation board and essay submissions on temple architecture (Indian, Greek, Roman, Buddhist, Incan, Mayan, Egyptian, etc.) located in any part of the world. 

• Presentation boards of 30cm X 30cm size; explain the temple/temple complex – the history of Architecture with drawings, facts, and details.
• Write an essay with the facts and details of the chosen temple structure.

“If you want to understand today you have to search yesterday.” – Pearl S. Buck

This competition aims to to understand the past of architecture for better architectural future.

What can be submitted?

• Presentation Boards of size 30cm X30cm
• Text of  up to 1500 words  or less. (600 words min.)
• Illustrations

“A generation which ignores history has no past and no future.” – Robert Heinlein

Participation:

• This competition is open to all.
• You can participate individually or as a team (Maximum 4 members in a team)

Submission Requirements:

Presentation Boards (2 -5) – jpeg. / jpg. format.

Essay with a title (Min. 600 words) – docx. / docs. Format

• Presentation Board of 30cm X 30cm size which may include, but are not limited to 3-D views, sketches, sections, isometric views, plans, elevations or any other means of graphical representation. You may include text labels, architectural markings & symbols and short descriptive text.
• The title must be included as the heading of the sheet.

“One of the deepest impulses in man is the impulse to record, to scratch a drawing on a tusk or keep a diary… The enduring value of the past is, one might say, the very basis of civilisation.” – John Jay Chapman

Registration deadline:  31 st July 2023

ADVANCED REGISTRATIONS

• AR1: APR 3 – APR 13
• AR2: APR 14 – APR 23
• AR3: APR 24 – May 03

STANDARD REGISTRATIONS

• SR1: MAY 04 – MAY 18
• SR2: MAY 19 – JUN 03
• SR3: JUN 04 – JUN 18
• SR4: JUN 19 – JUN 28

LATE REGISTRATIONS

• LR1: JUN 29– JUN 30 
• LR2: JUL 01– JUL 15
• LR3: JUL 16– JUL 31

Submission Starts:  28 th June 2023

Submission Ends: 11th  August 2023

Result Announcement: 14 th September 2023

Winners (X3): Certificate of achievement + Publication + Interview

Honourable mentions (X3): Certificates + Publication 

Shortlisted entries (X10): Certificates 

*All the certificates will be attested and e-format.

Registration:

Visit our website: www.archiol.org

History of architecture 2023: https://www.archiol.org/competitions/history-of-architecture-2023

>>> Go to the competition’s website <<<

Most popular competitions

People also viewed

Receive updates from us

Subscribe to receive the latest from our practice

Hear about the latest events, industry insights and updates from our team and the wider architectural industry.

Contact information

Select your preferences

Search Chetwoods

Laurie chetwood is a winner of the archiol sensory architecture 2023 essay competition.

We are delighted that Laurie Chetwood’s essay Experiencing Architecture: The Tingle Factor has been selected as one of the winners of the Archiol Sensory Architecture 2023 Essay Competition.

“I was inspired to participate in this essay competition by my belief that successful architectural design should deliver a positive physical, sensory and emotional human experience. At Chetwoods we are researching and measuring emotional responses to buildings, aiming to capture wellbeing and identify how different elements of places and spaces can be designed to induce happiness and enjoyment.” Laurie Chetwood.

Read Laurie’s award-winning essay below:

Experiencing Architecture: The Tingle Factor

“The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. He who knows it not and can no longer wonder, can no longer feel amazement, is as good as dead, a snuffed-out candle.” Albert Einstein

Architecture stimulates emotion – it can inspire and thrill you, leave you wanting more, leave you craving a deeper understanding, desiring a longer, more deeply reflective experience. Such buildings and spaces feel like they are feeding your soul.

Too often we behave as if lines, arcs, solids, voids and planes are the objects of architecture; but these are merely the tools of our trade, tools that should be employed to engender an intensity of experience for the occupants of our buildings.

Getting the five human senses right in architecture, interpreting them cleverly and applying them with imagination, can create a Sixth Sense, the stimulating and thrilling ‘tingle factor’ of experiencing both physical and emotional wellbeing within a space or place, where we can see texture, feel sound, smell stone, and taste the air.

The design of the places and spaces we inhabit and experience has a profound effect on our health and wellbeing. Our emotional response to buildings is inextricably linked to our sensory relationships with them. Every building type is an assembly of a vast matrix of sensory triggers that can be configured in a slightly different way, resulting in a different sensory and emotional response. Even subtle changes to each trigger can have a profound effect on the whole: one configuration results in a cathedral, another an aircraft hangar, another a gymnasium; make enough changes and you end up with a French cafe, or a potting shed.

But why is it that when we enter certain spaces we feel a sense of wellbeing and in others we just don’t?

Art and design over the past 50 years or so has tended to reject colour, decoration, variety, and a more organic approach to design. These elements have often been relegated and replaced with a minimal, more simplistic theme. This is unfortunate, as those relegated parts appeal more naturally to the human spirit, linked, as they are, to human nature, rather than to something more formulaic which often relies on man-made ideology.

As designers we seem to have forgotten how to appeal to human nature and to the human psyche. It might be economically convenient to build predictable, repetitive, prefabricated structures that march down the high street with regular monotony, sometimes with blank facades and certainly in monochrome, but human beings need something more — variety, something that changes, something that is colourful and decorative. We need to be aroused, intrigued, and delighted by something that is unpredictable.

Sensory wellbeing

In recent years, a greater understanding of the multi-sensory nature of the human mind has emerged from the field of cognitive neuroscience research. A growing body of psychological research outlines the profound impact that having all five of our traditional senses catered for has on our wellbeing, with the awareness, scientific analysis, and empirical measurement of the impact of acoustics, light, air and temperature.

Sensory design prioritises the creation of physical living, working and community places that cater to all facets of human life, resulting in spaces that improve sleep, lower stress and anxiety, enhance mood and cognitive function, and lower the risk of chronic disease.

Much of the research into sensory wellbeing refers to nature – biophilia, colour, variety, organic forms. Nature does everything so effortlessly. As human beings we have been associated with nature for longer than anything man-made, and we should take it more seriously, and not just for good environmental reasons. We are instinctively turned on by nature – it is our genes, it is in our heritage, and this goes back thousands of years. We recognise the smell of wood smoke; we are drawn to more organic shapes; we like to be among biophilia. Yet for most of us, we are surrounded in our daily lives by man-made objects, often created in a simplistic, minimal way, which suits the economics of our culture but does not necessarily suit our natural instincts and inclinations.

The positive contributions of biophilic design to health and wellbeing are no secret (Zhong et al., 2022). Biophilia stimulates subliminal reminiscent thoughts based on evolutionary memory of the more nature-centred lives of humans in the past: it is a central characteristic of sensory architectural design that reliably creates feelings of relaxation and ease.

Exposure to nature and biophilia reduces stress and anxiety, while exposure to light and colour improves mood, sleep, and cognitive function (Zhu et al., 2019). Buildings that embrace natural elements, such as plants or views of nature are generally agreed to promote feelings of relaxation and reduce stress. By incorporating natural light and high ceilings, they become spaces that promote feelings of openness and freedom.

In striving to achieve sensory design the transience and seasonal nature of nature and climate are sometimes ignored by installing permanent green roofs and design features in a misplaced understanding of the subtle relationship between humans and nature. Only by engaging with the seasonality of nature to inform the design process can we reach a true biophilic relationship.

Rather than treating landscape and artistic elements as ‘add-ons’ or self-contained parts within the overall design of a built scheme, we should explore ways of ensuring that each component of a design approach is not only integrated but also complementary.

Art, architecture and landscape

Over the past few hundred years, with acceleration in recent decades, the sprawling urbanisation of human existence has created increasingly confining human-centric spaces, stifling the possibilities for us to connect with nature and with our own senses. Life satisfaction has been found to increase in those who are given increased access to nature, even if they live in the built environment (McCarthy and Habib, 2018). In turn better life satisfaction has been linked to job performance (Jones, 2006).

Logistically, it is impossible now to discard our urban environments but it is tantalising to consider merging the two to create a more sympathetic environment for those of us who live in the city-a symbiotic, productive relationship of nature and urban life working in harmony in an attempt to improve our feelings of wellbeing.

So the city, with all its efficient, functional but impersonal surfaces, would benefit from a more natural, organic addition that softens the outlook and appeals more to human nature – we want variety, and we want shapes that aren’t predictable – and from an environmental perspective, it tells us a good story too.

A ‘holistic’ approach which uses art architecture and landscape to link building and landscape designs will make users feel positive towards – and comfortable with – the environment they occupy. The best-designed projects are invariably those which have successfully integrated their buildings into the spaces between and around them from the outset

Sensory architecture and technology

So far data centricity has focused solely on building performance metrics while almost entirely overlooking human responses to the way the buildings are designed.

The development of smart buildings is allowing the use of sensors, automation, and other technologies to monitor and manage aspects of the built environment including the physical comfort of users. Using real-time monitors allows a space to breath in harmony with the people in it. For example, at times of peak stress the building may choose to increase airflow and natural lighting to promote relaxation. Likewise, the building can better manage its energy consumption, for example if it knows a room is empty, it can turn off the relevant heating and lighting appliances.

In its attempts to become more data centric, architectural design has often overlooked its potential for nudging human experiences in physical spaces. Now light is being shed on a new application of this sensory architecture: sensorily responsive design.

The relationship between sensory architecture and technology is a complex one, with each shaping the other in a myriad of ways. On the one hand technology has allowed architecture to re-create human experience, and on the other sensory design considerations have inspired new technologies that seek to facilitate this.

Measuring emotional response to design

Although the impact of architectural design on human emotions is widely recognized, until now emotional responses have been subjective experiences that are challenging to measure and quantify objectively.

It is, however, now possible to analyse, scientifically, the ingredients for that feeling of wellbeing, the tingle factor one gets when all is good. There are many new techniques to assess how a human being will react to such things as colour, form, shapes and spaces. Analysing how the senses are served by perfume, a car, or a building is now possible.

Today’s technology makes it possible both to incrementally tweak and improve human experience and response to architecture, and to measure and quantify it, in ways that would have been impossible even a few years ago. Rapid technological and scientific advancement has facilitated the operationalisation of well-being using wearable sensors, with the ability to observe the minutiae of reactive expression, leading us to question how compatible the way we currently live is with a traditional approach to the impact of architecture on us.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which measures changes in blood flow to specific regions of the brain, allows researchers to observe which areas of the brain are activated in response to different architectural designs. A study conducted by the University of Sussex found that looking at pictures of buildings which are considered beautiful causes a release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure, reward, and motivation. This suggests that the experience of beauty in architecture has a profound impact on human emotions. A study conducted by the University of Bath found that people who view images of nature-inspired designs experience significantly lower levels of stress than those who view images of urban designs.

Another technique used for measuring emotional responses to architectural design is galvanic skin response (GSR) which measures changes in skin conductance response, which is an indicator of emotional arousal allowing researchers to observe how people respond emotionally to different architectural designs.

While university studies are being undertaken, however, these studies are not being conducted by the architects who are currently designing buildings and will share the urban and regional environments we are creating in the immediate future.,

There is a disconnect between academic research and practical application that we are addressing as architects at Chetwoods where we are measuring emotional response to design.

We are working in collaboration with the University of Wolverhampton, and with research advice from the University of Cambridge, on a research project to understand, record and analyse human emotional responses to the design of buildings and spaces. Our research team is trialling cutting-edge data-centric technologies to measure and analyse how the design of a space can evoke happiness and sensory delight.

The recent intersection between architectural design and immersive technologies such as virtual and augmented realities (VR and AR) has allowed us to measure responses in immersive digital environments where design elements in a building can be altered ‘live’ while user reactions are monitored and measured to achieve the most positive sensory response. We are obtaining empirical data that can inform our future design work and enable us to design happiness into our schemes.

The ability to measure emotional responses to architectural design scientifically, is a big opportunity for the future that will enable architects and designers to create buildings and spaces that proactively promote human mental wellbeing.

The Sixth Sense

At its core, sensory architecture prioritises the creation of spaces that consider and cater for all aspects of human life including emotional and psychological wellbeing. It is the way forward for a more sustainable, healthy, and human-centred built environment.

Today we have all the tools and evidence to allow us to create sustainable and commercially viable buildings that regard humans as super-sensitive animals and ultimately deliver the Tingle Factor.

We need to design buildings that are clever, beautiful and enjoyable. If we get the five human senses right, interpreting and using the latest technology with imagination, we will create a Sixth Sense of overall wellbeing, delivering spaces and places that people will love, and in which they can flourish at work, rest or play.

References:

Gupta, G., Gupta, A., Jaiswal, V., & Ansari, M. D. (2018, December). A review and analysis of mobile health applications for Alzheimer patients and caregivers. In 2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC) (pp. 171-175). IEEE.

Jones, M. D. (2006). Which is a better predictor of job performance: Job satisfaction or life satisfaction?. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 8(1), 20-42.

Kabisch, N., Qureshi, S., & Haase, D. (2015). Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces—A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact assessment review, 50, 25-34.

Lane, A. E., Young, R. L., Baker, A. E., & Angley, M. T. (2010). Sensory processing subtypes in autism: Association with adaptive behavior. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 40, 112-122.

McCarthy, S., & Habib, M. A. (2018). Investigation of life satisfaction, travel, built environment and attitudes. Journal of Transport & Health, 11, 15-24.

Pierrette, M., Marquis-Favre, C., Morel, J., Rioux, L., Vallet, M., Viollon, S., & Moch, A. (2012). Noise annoyance from industrial and road traffic combined noises: A survey and a total annoyance model comparison. Journal of environmental psychology, 32(2), 178-186.

Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141.

Zhu, Y., Yang, M., Yao, Y., Xiong, X., Li, X., Zhou, G., & Ma, N. (2019). Effects of illuminance and correlated color temperature on daytime cognitive performance, subjective mood, and alertness in healthy adults. Environment and Behavior, 51(2), 199-230.

Article tags

Share this insight

Related projects

RELATED INSIGHTS

Chetwood Architects is the trading name of Chetwoods Associates Services Ltd / Registered in England / Registered Office / Ground Floor, Unit B, Dickens Court, Britton Street, London, United Kingdom, EC1M 5SX / Registration Number: 2203070